Apparently, Israel’s expected attack on Iran has been postponed in the 90th minute after receiving a generous offer package from America.
The contents of the mentioned proposal are not exactly known, but it seems to include tempting deals:
Kabul 24: Israel should refrain from attacking specific targets in Iran in exchange for receiving diplomatic support – which it desperately needs – and military weapons – probably of the type it has been deprived of until now.
By speculation, it can be said that nuclear sites are at the top of the possible prohibited targets of America, followed by economic centers.
According to the news, the Minister of Defense of Israel is going to go to Washington soon; Probably for bargaining and hammering and more adjustments and full coordination with America.
This incident shows that despite Netanyahu’s repeated defiance in the last year, America’s role in this crisis is still vital.
The only country that can put pressure on Israel and impose some restrictions on its aggressive policy, fearing the spread of war and facing its unknown and devastating consequences.
The other side of this story is Iran, whose strategic loneliness is more visible than ever.
Iran is not a member of any effective collective security agreement and does not have strategic relations with international poles such as China and Russia.
In recent decades, in the absence of the above components, Iran has relied on a network of non-state actors and proxy forces, all of which are now under fire.
The silence and inaction of China and Russia in recent days is not only due to their reluctance not to upset the policy of balancing tendencies in the Middle East, but also to their basic inability to influence Israel’s behavior in any way.
From any point of view, the aforementioned deal is in favor of Israel. Gallant returns to America with his hands full and brings with him the strategic support of the White House in the conflict with Iran.
Regardless of the results, the current crisis seems to lead to serious revisions in Iran’s defense strategy: from the nuclear doctrine to the revision of regional and international orientations.
Balancing the foreign policy has been the main difficulty of Iran in the last two hundred years, since the country was exposed to the influence and invasion of Western imperialism and there was not enough national power to deal with it.
Iran’s foreign policy in the 40s and 50s, which had more balancing elements than any other period, seems to teach lessons;
There were close relations with both international poles of that time;
Something in the essence of the foreign policy of the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, who are falling in love with China, Russia and America at the same time.
At that time, Iran built heavy industries with the help of the Soviet Union and equipped and equipped the armed forces through America.
Saladin Khadio
